they both appear to be good deals the main differences i see are the first has some sort of extended warranty which is a plus and it only rear wheel drive
while the second is all wheel drive and you being in Chicago this is a plus for the winter and it is a year newer just my :m2:
In the newer one, look at the pics, see how the rims are rusted? Should I be worried about that, or can that come off?
Does having rear wheel or awd effect mpg by any chance?
I would thing that the second one would be a better choice also basec on the AWD in that you are in Chicago; plus it has Nav

; of course with your awesome system you probably would not leave that in anyway:bonk:
lol... yeah, it would come out, but always nice to have!
The second one. It's got AWD, Nav and is a year newer. Although the first one does have a back seat DVD system and fewer miles (per year) than the second...I'd still go with #2.
The first one has a warranty. With the way trailblazers are sometimes I would think it wouldn't even be a choice between a warranty and one without one. AWD is good to have i know but there are so many things that can happen. There are problems with the tranny you always hear SS guys complain about and without a warranty that could become an expensive fix. :m2:
Well, i'm not too worried about warranty, my dad has a mechanic shop. So all my work gets done by him.
The 2006 also has had 3 owners, all of them had been leased.. Don't they beat the crap out of the cars?
Right now i'm leaning towards the 2007, but I don't like the fact that the rims are rusted.
And just to recap, awd vs rwd, does it effect mpg?